Pakistan has been acting as a go-between, or mediator, since the war began. Pakistan's prime minister sent his top ministers to meet with leaders from both Iran and the United States. This kind of careful diplomacy is very important when two countries do not trust each other.
The war has caused big problems for oil shipping. Both countries have blocked ships in important sea routes near Iran. Oil prices went to about 108 dollars per barrel. This is high, but it did not go higher today because of the positive news about peace.
The two sides still disagree on important questions. Iran wants the United States to lift economic punishments called sanctions. The U.S. wants Iran to limit its nuclear weapons program. Finding a solution that both sides accept will take more time and effort.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi signaled a potential shift in the 11-week U.S.-Iran conflict on Thursday, stating that Washington's latest ceasefire proposal had narrowed the gaps between the two parties. The comment marked the most conciliatory language from Tehran since the war began in early March, and sent oil prices slightly lower from their recent highs above 109 dollars per barrel.
Pakistan has emerged as the indispensable intermediary in the negotiations. Pakistan's interior minister arrived in Tehran on Thursday for the second time in the same week, reflecting the intense diplomatic activity behind the scenes. Earlier, Pakistan's Army Chief General Asim Munir had traveled to Tehran in April to convey messages from Washington and help establish the current Pakistan-mediated framework.
The core disagreements remain substantial. Iran insists on a phased approach: first, an end to what it calls an illegal U.S. naval blockade of its ports and a suspension of oil sanctions, before addressing its nuclear and ballistic missile programs. Washington, by contrast, wants simultaneous concessions on the nuclear file from the outset. Bridging this sequencing dispute is the central challenge facing Pakistani negotiators.
Analysts note that Iran's willingness to describe the U.S. proposal as having narrowed the gaps represents a tactical softening rather than a fundamental change of position. With Brent crude trading near 108 dollars, energy markets remain highly sensitive to any sign that a deal is approaching - or falling apart. Both sides appear to understand that prolonged conflict carries serious economic costs that neither can afford indefinitely.
In what diplomats cautiously characterized as the most substantive positive signal since hostilities began eleven weeks ago, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told state television on Thursday that Washington's latest ceasefire proposal had, to some extent, narrowed the gaps dividing the two belligerents. The carefully hedged formulation - neither an endorsement nor a rejection - suggested that Islamabad's backchannel diplomacy was yielding incremental progress even as kinetic operations in the Persian Gulf remained suspended under the fragile April 8 ceasefire.
Pakistan has positioned itself as the indispensable architectural power in this negotiation. The interior minister's return to Tehran - his second visit within a single week - underscores the frenetic tempo of shuttle diplomacy that Islamabad has sustained since Army Chief General Asim Munir's inaugural mission to Tehran in mid-April. That visit, aimed at conveying messages from Washington and mapping the contours of a viable framework, established the trust architecture that subsequent Pakistani interlocutors have sought to leverage. The Islamabad-hosted plenary sessions, at which Iranian Speaker Ghalibaf faced an American delegation led by Vice President Vance, demonstrated Pakistan's rare credibility on both sides of a geopolitical fault line.
The structural impasse hinges on sequencing. Tehran has insisted on a phased architecture in which the lifting of the U.S. naval blockade and a suspension of oil-export sanctions precede - and create the conditions for - discussions on its nuclear enrichment and ballistic missile capabilities. Washington, citing verification concerns and the risk of premature sanctions relief, demands parallel treatment of the nuclear file from the outset. This sequencing dispute is not merely procedural: it encodes the deeper asymmetry of leverage each side perceives itself as possessing.
Brent crude, trading near 108 dollars per barrel, remained acutely sensitive to the diplomatic oscillations. Analysts at Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley have noted that each incremental shift in negotiating language - whether Araghchi's 'narrowed gaps' formulation or prior ultimatums from IRGC commanders - moves energy markets by several dollars in the span of hours. With Lloyd's war-risk premiums for Very Large Crude Carrier transits through Hormuz still elevated at 0.55 percent of hull value, the economic cost of prolonged conflict is being priced in real time by market participants who understand that neither Washington nor Tehran can afford indefinite belligerence without accelerating domestic economic deterioration.
Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on Thursday that the latest American ceasefire proposal has narrowed the gaps between the two sides, marking the most positive Iranian signal yet in the 11-week conflict. Pakistan's interior minister traveled to Tehran for the second time in a week, continuing the country's vital role as mediator between the United States and Iran. Oil markets steadied near $108 per barrel as diplomats expressed cautious hope that a one-page peace framework could be within reach.
Iran and the United States are talking about peace. Iran says the new plan from the U.S. is better. The two countries are still in a war. They want to stop the war.
Pakistan is helping both sides. Pakistan talks to Iran and the U.S. A man from Pakistan went to Tehran this week. Tehran is the city where Iran's government is.
Oil prices did not go up or down much today. That is good news. People hope the war will end soon. Many people want peace.
The war started about 11 weeks ago. Both sides are tired. Iran and the U.S. have many problems to solve. But today there is some hope.
1What does Iran say about the new U.S. plan?
2Which country is helping Iran and the U.S. talk?
3What is Tehran?
4How long has the war been going on?
5What did oil prices do today?
6Iran and the U.S. are talking about peace.
7Pakistan is fighting against Iran.
8The war started about 11 weeks ago.
9Iran says the new plan is very bad.
10People hope the war will end.
11Iran and the U.S. want to stop the ___.
12___ is helping both Iran and the U.S. talk.
13Today there is some ___.