Intel's shares jumped more than ten percent after the news, rising to around 134 dollars per share. Investors were excited because Apple is one of the most valuable technology companies in the world. A contract to make chips for Apple's iPhones and Mac computers would be a huge win for Intel.
Currently, Apple designs its own chips, called the Apple Silicon family, and uses the Taiwanese company TSMC to manufacture them. Intel has been trying to rebuild its business and become a major chip manufacturer for other companies. If the Apple deal is confirmed, it would use Intel's most advanced manufacturing process, called 18A.
However, neither Apple nor Intel officially confirmed the terms of the deal after Trump's post. Analysts warned that the announcement may have come before contracts were fully signed. Intel shares remained higher as investors waited for official statements from both companies.
On June 18, President Trump posted on Truth Social that Apple had agreed to partner with Intel to manufacture computer chips in the United States, framing the announcement as a victory for American industrial policy. Intel's stock responded dramatically, jumping more than ten percent to its highest level in years and lifting the broader semiconductor index. The announcement drew immediate comparisons to earlier White House-brokered deals that brought chipmakers like TSMC and Samsung to build US factories under the CHIPS Act.
The specific manufacturing process reportedly involved is Intel's 18A node, the company's most advanced fabrication technology, which uses gate-all-around transistors and a novel backside power delivery system. Intel has been betting its future on becoming a contract chipmaker able to rival TSMC and Samsung Foundry. A marquee customer like Apple, whose Silicon chips power every iPhone, iPad, Mac, and Apple Watch, would provide a credibility boost and steady revenue that could transform Intel's foundry ambitions into a viable business.
The announcement created a peculiar situation in which a corporate deal was first revealed by a head of state rather than by the companies involved. Neither Apple CEO Tim Cook nor Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan issued a statement following Trump's post. Analysts speculated that the deal may be preliminary - a letter of intent rather than a finalized supply agreement - and that Trump's announcement reflected the administration's strategy of using corporate news as public relations wins before contracts are fully signed.
The strategic implications for the US semiconductor industry are significant. Currently, nearly all of Apple's chips are manufactured at TSMC's Taiwan facilities, creating a concentration of risk on an island that sits at the center of US-China geopolitical tensions. Moving even a portion of Apple chip production to Intel's US plants - in Oregon, Arizona, or New Mexico - would reduce that vulnerability and could trigger a wider reshoring of advanced semiconductor manufacturing.
The announcement that shook the semiconductor sector on June 18 did not originate in an earnings call, a press conference, or a regulatory filing. It came from a Truth Social post. President Trump's declaration that Apple had agreed to build chips with Intel - an assertion neither company's investor relations team moved to confirm or deny with anything approaching specificity - instantly elevated Intel's market capitalization by roughly 17 billion dollars and sent the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index to a new intraday record. The episode encapsulates the peculiar market dynamics of an era in which a head of state's social media feed functions as a primary source of material corporate information.
The strategic logic behind such a deal is not hard to construct. Intel's Foundry Services division has been a costly bet on the proposition that the company's engineering heritage and the United States government's CHIPS Act subsidies could together produce a credible alternative to TSMC's monopolistic dominance of the leading-edge manufacturing market. Apple, whose in-house designed Silicon SoCs currently represent TSMC's largest single customer, would constitute the most prestigious proof-of-concept a nascent contract foundry could possibly attract. For Intel, landing Apple as a customer on its 18A node - the first Intel process to incorporate gate-all-around nanosheet transistors and backside power delivery - would signal to every hesitant hyperscaler and fabless design house that the foundry risk is manageable.
For Apple, the calculus is more complex. Its migration away from Intel CPUs to in-house Silicon was itself a decade-long project of vertical integration, and a return to Intel manufacturing - even while retaining design sovereignty - requires trusting a supply chain that Cupertino has systematically reduced its exposure to. The geopolitical dimension is, however, compelling: a bipartisan consensus in Washington views the concentration of leading-edge semiconductor manufacturing on Taiwan as an unacceptable strategic vulnerability, and a company with Apple's lobbying heft and brand equity may have calculated that participating in domestic reshoring yields regulatory goodwill worth several percentage points of wafer cost.
What remains unresolved is the question of sequencing. Chip supply agreements of this complexity typically require months of qualification testing, yield commitments, and ramp scheduling before a single wafer is committed. The administration's announcement of a deal whose contours neither party will confirm on the record suggests the White House is treating the newsworthy signal as the end product rather than the beginning of a process. Markets, for their part, priced in the outcome rather than the uncertainty - which is, perhaps, precisely what the announcement was designed to achieve.
President Trump posted on Truth Social on June 18 that Apple has agreed to partner with Intel to design and manufacture computer chips inside the United States. Intel shares jumped more than ten percent on the announcement, marking one of the company's biggest single-day gains in years. Neither Apple nor Intel officially confirmed the specific terms, but analysts say the deal would use Intel's most advanced 18A fabrication process.
President Trump said Apple and Intel will work together. They will make computer chips in the United States. Intel's stock price went up a lot after this news.
Apple makes iPhones and computers. Intel makes chips for computers. Trump said the two companies have a deal.
Intel shares went up more than ten percent. This is very good news for Intel. Apple usually buys chips from another company in Asia.
1What did President Trump announce?
2How much did Intel's shares go up?
3Which company normally makes chips for Apple?
4In which country will Apple and Intel make chips?
5Where did President Trump post this news?
6Intel's share price went down after the announcement.
7Apple usually makes all its own chips in the US.
8Trump posted the announcement on social media.
9The deal would bring chip manufacturing to the US.
10Both Apple and Intel officially confirmed all details of the deal.
11Apple and Intel will make computer ___ in the United States.
12Intel shares went up more than ten ___ after the announcement.
13Apple usually buys chips from a company in ___.